<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Law Professor &#187; Mobile Devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/mobile-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com</link>
	<description>Internet, Mobile, Social Networking Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Patent Lawsuit Against American Idol&#8217;s SMS Voting</title>
		<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/patent-lawsuit-against-american-idols-sms-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/patent-lawsuit-against-american-idols-sms-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelawprofessor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelawprofessor.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man claims that the American Idol television show "ripped off" his idea of live audience voting and has sued them for patent infringement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="Man claims American Idol stole his idea for SMS voting" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/2010/06/19/2010-06-19_idol_ripped_off_my_idea_sez_texas_man.html">New York Daily News reported</a> that a Texas retiree, Edward Lyda, has sued hit TV show, American Idol, in New York State Supreme Court. Lyda apparently claims that American Idol &#8220;ripped off&#8221; his idea about using live audience voting using SMS in a television show, which is allegedly patented.<span id="more-473"></span>I haven&#8217;t been able to read the substance of the lawsuit but I did take a took at the Lyda&#8217;s <a title="Edward Lyda SMS Voting Patent" href="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/downloads/?did=7">SMS voting patent</a> &#8211; I was surprised and not surprised at the same time. The background history contained in the patent describes Lyda&#8217;s revelation that he could build a voting system that records votes from remote viewers of a live television show that (a) doesn&#8217;t require a computer system connected to the world wide web, and (b) allows wireless voting that extends beyond a few feet of infrared wireless devices that extend for only a few feet, like your television&#8217;s remote control device. The &#8220;invention&#8221; described in the patent is one where a &#8220;remote response device&#8221; can communicate with a presenter on live television using different responses, such as other devices have used a wired telephone to accomplish the same task.<a href="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/patentdevice.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-483" title="Remote Voting Device" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/patentdevice-201x300.jpg" alt="Remote Voting Device" width="201" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>The device that you see on the right hand side &#8220;depicts a response device according to an embodiment of the present invention having a limited keypad&#8221; &#8211; just like a mobile telephone. The patent continues to describe in general details regarding an &#8220;electronic response device other than a computer&#8221; but which also has a CPU &#8211; arguably the very definition of a &#8220;computer&#8221; device. This device and a general system is described and outlines what anyone would be required generally in order to set up a remote response wireless voting system. Considering that wireless technologies (such as the widespread use of paging) already existed at the time, it seems that this &#8220;idea&#8221; isn&#8217;t altogether innovative. I&#8217;m not quite sure why Lyda and his attorney limited themselves to suing American Idol &#8211; they should have sued everyone who uses a mobile phone or any device that doesn&#8217;t use the &#8220;world wide web&#8221; for purposes of having real time voting.</p>
<p>United States patent law is a difficult field of law to grasp and understanding how some patents are approved and others are not approved is no less challenging. Under federal law (with regard to a &#8220;utility patent&#8221;), any person who &#8220;invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent.&#8221;  From my understanding, to qualify for a patent, an invention must be &#8220;useful,&#8221; &#8220;novel,&#8221; and &#8220;nonobvious.&#8221; In addition to having a useful purpose, the requirement of being &#8220;novel&#8221; means that the invention was not:</p>
<div id="_mcePaste">
<ul>
<li>known or used by others in the US prior to the patent application;</li>
<li>patented or described in any printed publication in the U.S. prior to the applicant&#8217;s invention;</li>
<li>prior patented or described in a printed publication in any country more than one year prior to the US patent application;</li>
<li>used in public or available for sale in the U.S. more than one year prior to the US patent application;</li>
<li>abandoed by the applicant;.</li>
<li>patented by the applicant in a foreign country or had an application filed within a year of the U.S. patent application filing;</li>
<li>prior described in a U.S. patent granted to someone else;</li>
<li>invented by the applicant;</li>
<li>previously invented by another person prior to the applicant and the inventor did not abandon, conceal or suppress the invention.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>The patent must also not be &#8220;obvious.&#8221; I&#8217;m not quite sure what this should mean, considering how many patents seem extremely obvious to me although they might not be obvious to my pets and five year old nephew. Since there is precipitation that falls from the sky periodically, a system of wiping the windshield of a car using a mechanical wiping device would seem an obvious need. Since the rain falls with different intensity, the frequency of the wiping mechanism would have to increase or slow down as well. There are several famous patents that have been filed with regard to both windshield wipers and the frequency those wipers wipe your windows. Most famous in the Internet industry was Amazon.com&#8217;s &#8220;<a title="Amazon's One Click Patent" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-click">One Click Patent</a>&#8221; &#8211; which seems to me the reason you&#8217;d want to use a database that stores customer information. It is possible that I may have been able to file for at least several dozen patents but the ideas themselves seemed far too obvious to me, yet they exist as patents at the <a title="United States Patent and Trademark Office" href="http://www.uspto.gov" target="_blank">USPTO</a>.</p>
<p>There are several ongoing lawsuits regarding could computing inventions amongst other uses of technology that promise to make much of what we use every day more expensive due to licensing fees. It is said that necessity is the mother of invention. If so,  it makes me wonder whether it is necessity that should be granted a monopoly for &#8220;inventions&#8221; for a period of 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/patent-lawsuit-against-american-idols-sms-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple iPad Flouts Trademark Infringement &#8211; What&#8217;s Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/apple-ipad-flouts-trademark-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/apple-ipad-flouts-trademark-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelawprofessor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelawprofessor.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Apple make a major gaff by releasing the new Apple iPad tablet without first registering a trademark for the product?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either the arrogance at Apple has greatly exceeded that at Microsoft at its peak or I should be sending in my resume to Cupertino with all due haste. Apparently Apple decided to launch its iPad product without regard or care for existing trademarks that may have been filed in the United States. Apparently Fujitsu filed in 1993 for the iPad trademark for a &#8220;HAND-HELD COMPUTING DEVICE FOR WIRELESS NETWORKING IN A RETAIL ENVIRONMENT&#8221; and you can find the <a title="Fujitsu iPad, not the Apple iPad!" href="http://www.fujitsu.com/us/services/retailing/technology/hardware/?navid=608">Fujitsu iPad product brochure here</a>. Apple apparently sent a letter in opposition to this trademark for undisclosed reasons (rumors are afloat that it is under the doctrine of &#8220;divine right.&#8221;)<span id="more-461"></span></p>
<p>Amusing is finding another registration of iPad just two weeks ago by a company called &#8220;IP Application Development LLC&#8221; as well. It looks like Apple will need to oppose that filing as well (unless this curious company registering the mark in several other countries is a front for The White Giant.) So was it sheer hubris that led Apple to release the latest iProduct without concern for trademark law or was it an oversight of counsel that had been partying too often in the valley? Apple actually does have a fine team of attorneys in Cupertino, some of which I have the pleasure of friendship.</p>
<p>This newsworthy item begs me to ask the following question. After tearing my ACL playing football several years ago in Central Park (while making a darn fine interception), I registered the domain iKnee.com. I&#8217;m also the proud owner of iKoto.com and iSlime.com (don&#8217;t ask, I must have imbibed too much sake when that occurred.) This begs the question as to whether I will need to surrender said domains should Apple come calling as it runs out of words to use for its growing product line?</p>
<p>While we&#8217;re in a jocular mood, I was amused to discover that other companies registering iPad as a trademark included a bra manufacturer. It seems that humor has cropped up on all fronts regarding the product, purporting that the iPad can solve a whole host of female problems. Joking aside, from a utilitarian standpoint I&#8217;m not sure what the iPad is supposed to do and the void it fills for up to $1,000. Perhaps Apple wants to be the &#8220;first in the game&#8221; but this is an expensive way to go to accomplish something I cannot identify. It has no USB adapter and it has no camera. It doesn&#8217;t feature flash for web browsing and, from my understanding, 3G and WiFi will only be available in upcoming models. There aren&#8217;t storage expansion options via SD cards either. Perhaps it buys extra coolness for $500 (plus all the necessary extras.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/apple-ipad-flouts-trademark-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T permits VOIP, Skype, Google Voice on iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/att-permits-voip-skype-google-voice-on-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/att-permits-voip-skype-google-voice-on-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelawprofessor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VOIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelawprofessor.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T released the news that it will permit the use of VOIP (Voice Over IP) applications to utilize its 3G network via the iPhone, such as Skype and Google Voice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today AT&amp;T released the news that it will permit the use of VOIP (Voice Over IP) programs to utilize its 3G network via the iPhone. Previously, applications such as Skype and Google Voice were limited to WiFi-only and not permitted to use the 3G data network. This decision comes at an important time when AT&amp;T and other carriers are being scrutinized by the Federal Communications Commission for control they exert over devices and applications allowed on their networks. <span id="more-227"></span></p>
<p>AT&amp;T relayed concerns to the FCC in August, that iPhone users placing voice calls over its data network would significantly decrease customer revenues, resulting in the cost being passed onto consumers in the form of higher priced iPhones.</p>
<p>Apple and the FCC also issued laudatory statements about the decision and Apple will amend its agreements to include VOIP calls.</p>
<p>From a consumer standpoint, this is an important decision as customers will be able to use the &#8220;unlimited data&#8221; portion of their plans without voice calls eating into their own minutes.</p>
<p>Ralph de la Vega, CEO of AT&amp;T&#8217;s mobility and consumer markets division, stated: &#8220;Today&#8217;s decision was made after evaluating our customers&#8217; expectations and use of the device compared to dozens of others we offer.&#8221; AT&amp;T spokesman Michael Balmoris said that the decision was in progress for several months and had little to do with the heightened scrutiny into AT&amp;T&#8217;s practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/att-permits-voip-skype-google-voice-on-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the iPhone 3GS has Bad Battery Life</title>
		<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/why-the-iphone-3gs-has-battery-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/why-the-iphone-3gs-has-battery-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelawprofessor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelawprofessor.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasons why the iPhone 3GS has bad battery life and burns down quickly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After performing some detailed testing and replacing the iPhone 3GS with a new unit, it seems conclusive &#8211; Apple&#8217;s &#8220;weak&#8221; battery is sufficient for most tasks but the 3.0.1 operating system is the cause of serious battery drain. Yes, the battery size is a minute change from its predecessor, a poor choice of style over substance. But the real problem is the iPhone OS, version 3.0. I&#8217;ll elaborate as to why a day does not go by where I return home with my phone&#8217;s battery above the 40-50% mark. <span id="more-210"></span>After testing video and audio, the times turned out to be impressive. Video can easily exceed 7-8 hours and even close in on the 10 hours promised from a new battery. On two occasions I played of 5 hours of video which left roughly 48% remaining for battery life. Audio playback and talk time also provided reasoanble results. But the problem comes from using the phone for 3G, location services and WiFi usage, the worst offenders being the first two. The use of location services, which seems to be practically required or requested by most iPhone applications I have installed (whether they should care or not), is the primary source of rapid battery drain. You should turn off location services when not in use, even if this means disappointment in not being able to use Google Lattitude as you had expected.</p>
<p>A significant part of the unacceptable iPhone battery drain comes from Apple&#8217;s insane notion that the iPhone is always connected wirelessly to &#8220;the cloud&#8221; and should always try to connect to retrieve new information at every opportunity. This will occur regardless of how the user utilizes the phone and Apple doesn&#8217;t seem to think those user settings are important.</p>
<p>Try using the mail application, for instance. I have several accounts which all are unfortunately separated into their own mailboxes (you cannot consolidate mailboxes on the built-in mail application.) Each time you merely seek to look up an email to get a name, phone number or address, the iPhone will attempt to connect to the server and retrieve new mail. If you do this multiple times daily as I do (and most people who use email hourly), your phone will drain rapidly and there is nothing you can do about it. Unfortunately Apple provides precious few email options and doesn&#8217;t include an option to stop checking each time you open a mailbox account. The solution? Get rid of all your unnecessary mailboxes, use only the most critical accounts and check them as rarely as possible.</p>
<p>Another problem I&#8217;ve noticed is that, even if I&#8217;m using Airplane Mode (radio off), virtually every application I fire up tells me that there is no Internet connection or that Location Services is turned off. The frequency in which this occurs is maddening. I cannot imagine that these constant messages don&#8217;t burn up more battery time as applications search for connectivity to the cloud. Since I spend a great deal of time on the subway train and out of range, I use Airplane Mode every day for at least 90-150 minutes. Wouldn&#8217;t you think that, by now, Apple would have a setting to stop these nag screens ?</p>
<p>Another problem is the inane restriction that Apple has in not allowing any file synchronization using the USB port other than what iTunes permits. This means that if you have documents or other files that you sync, you must maintain a WiFi connection. For example, I use Dataviz&#8217; Documents to Go and also the QuickOffice application to synchronize my office work files. With my Palm and Blackberry, each time I had the phone in the dock, a USB synchronization allowed all my files to be synchronized. It was poetry in motion. With the iPhone, I must make sure WiFi is turned on, open up each application individually and make sure it is paired and/or connected via WiFi and manually synchronize. It&#8217;s enough to tear your hair out and drain your battery too.</p>
<p>While the iPhone certainly has its benefits and can be an enjoyable experience, as a practical business phone it&#8217;s a liability at present. I&#8217;m afraid that we might not see a remedy coming from Apple any time soon. Ultimately your choices are either (a) consider using your phone less intenstively, (b) buy a bulky extended battery pack, or (c) make sure you&#8217;ve got charging opportuinities at your remote locations. Other battery saving tips are available on Apple&#8217;s site, such as turning down the brightness, etc. but these are just general tips and won&#8217;t solve the ultimate issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/why-the-iphone-3gs-has-battery-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple iPhone 3GS Review: Bad for Business?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/apple-iphone-3gs-review-bad-for-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/apple-iphone-3gs-review-bad-for-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelawprofessor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelawprofessor.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're considering buying the Apple iPhone 3GS or any iPod or related product - especially for business purposes - you'll definitely want to read this essential article. I was one of the fortunate people to receive a brand new 32GB iPhone 3GS at a discount price. It arrived within a week from placing my order via overnight mail from AT&#038;T.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re considering buying the Apple iPhone 3GS or any iPod or related product &#8211; especially for business purposes &#8211; you&#8217;ll definitely want to read this essential article. I was one of the fortunate people to receive a brand new 32GB iPhone 3GS at a discount price. It arrived within a week from placing my order via overnight mail from AT&amp;T. I was excited at the proposition of perusing the 60,000+ state of the art iPhone applications! After getting beyond the glamorous surface and still enjoying a great user experience, I&#8217;ve found several surprises that might affect your understanding of the iPhone.<span id="more-110"></span></p>
<p>The iPhone 3GS is a true, graceful experience of combining minimalism and modernity with marketing and packaging that is second to none. It was exciting to unwrap and unbox the new gadget that promised so much fun and functionality. It does deliver, no doubt. As a music and video player, it&#8217;s still the clear leader both in form, function and audio/video quality. But how useful and practical is it for business? I&#8217;ve heard it said many times that it&#8217;s more an entertainment device and, to a large extent, this is still true.  This article will explain my experience with the iPhone and also provide information on how it differs from the functionality found in most other phones. Depending upon how you work, this might not all be a completely positive and streamlined experience, especially if you don&#8217;t own a Mac.</p>
<div id="attachment_129" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-129" title="Applications" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Applications-300x141.jpg" alt="One Click Purchases Only at iTunes" width="300" height="141" /><p class="wp-caption-text">You must impulse buy everything @ iTunes!</p></div>
<p>I installed Apple&#8217;s synchronization software &#8211; iTunes &#8211; and was disturbed to discover that the mere act of registering the iPhone with Apple required me to provide Apple my personal information and credit card number. Apparently this might be the case because Apple wants to set up an account for you at the iTunes store, the only place you can buy applications approved for the iPhone. Interestingly enough, I also found that I couldn&#8217;t set up a &#8220;shopping cart&#8221; and could only use &#8220;one click purchasing&#8221; &#8211; the power of impulse purchases where you don&#8217;t see just how much all those applications really cost in total. I was beginning to sense a trend focusing on control and revenue from value added services, which is apparently a relatively common perception of Apple&#8217;s focus these days.</p>
<p>I downloaded several applications and found them extremely useful. Facebook&#8217;s iPhone application is marvelous. A Google Analytics application allows me to see, at a glance, all of my web site metrics including what happens at <a title="Free Legal Advice" href="http://www.thelaw.com">TheLaw.com</a>. Safari is a quick, useful and delightful web browser to use. The music and media portion were quick, easy to operate and the screen is beautiful. It&#8217;s obvious why the iPod is so popular. Google Maps is splendid being sprawled across a large screen. RSS, podcasting, glorious handling of rich media. One handed operation with the iPhone is generally not possible but there are advantages to its OS that are time saving over a Blackberry. If you type numerous emails, this phone is probably not going to work for you. While you will not get the same, satisfying tactile feedback from a physical keyboard, I was surprised that the iPhone&#8217;s screen-based keyboard with error correction seemed to be better than I had imagined. If you don&#8217;t regularly type long emails, the iPhone keyboard is extremely serviceable for email with practice and if you have small to medium sized thumbs. It has specialized functions to aid with typing (excellent word correction) as well as cursor placement (hold to zoom in on the screen to place a cursor.) My only gripe is that typing commas or periods takes too many keystrokes and the only way to get a a different keyboard layout is to hack (or &#8220;jailbreak&#8221;) your iPhone. Instructions on usage are sparse and you will best served downloading the manual for the iPhone from the Apple web site and giving it a quick read.</p>
<div id="attachment_152" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 217px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-152" title="today" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/today-207x300.jpg" alt="Unavailable unless you jailbreak the iPhone. Apple" width="207" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Jailbreak! If Apple doesn&#39;t think you need it, you&#39;re not getting it from third parties.</p></div>
<p>But shortly thereafter, I began to discover the frustration that other iPhone users conveyed to me but could not properly articulate. Apple&#8217;s need for total control over the iPhone can, at times, greatly undermine its utility. Unless Apple provides all useful and necessary system extensions, you&#8217;re simply not going to see them in the iPhone. At times it will feel as if the iPhone is a work in progress with some glaring omissions &#8211; after all, it took Apple years and three versions of its iPhone operating system just to implement basic copy and paste functionality.</p>
<p>For example, the iPhone is noticeably missing an easy access &#8220;today screen.&#8221; Important to any business professional is the ability to see the daily agenda, current tasks and phone notifications quickly. On the iPhone, this is not possible except if the phone has been hacked. Apple is so vigilant about preventing third party developers from creating such necessary additions that it even went so far as to <a title="Apple Files Patent on Today Screen" href="http://www.seangw.com/wordpress/index.php/2008/09/apples-controversy-regarding-stealing-ideas-from-intelliscreen/">file a patent two years ago</a> for the creation of a long overdue and extremely common functionality. A today screen won&#8217;t happen unless Apple provides it. Looking for battery saving utilities that can control common settings for your phone in one contenient place? They just don&#8217;t exist as Apple has not provided necessary tools to developers to improve what they believe works well enough on its own. It&#8217;s either Apple&#8217;s way or the highway! Other odd ommissions the inability to add/remove custom text messages sounds and other alerts (which apparently use a different file type and location) and the need to use command line programs such as &#8220;ssh&#8221; to log into the phone and make changes. Chances are that virtually all the software tools to customize your iPhone are not provided by Apple but by third parties, which is in direct contrast to what most would expect and where Nokia excels with its Symbian phone customization software.</p>
<p>With regard to reception &#8211; at times my AT&amp;T GSM iPhone received better signal than my Verizon Wireless Blackberry 8330 &#8211; even in the New York City Subway (take 34th Street and Herald Square as a good example.) The phone reception isn&#8217;t perfect, cuts out in some areas not covered as well as Verizon (such as Roosevelt Island), but the audio quality when connected was at least as good as other phones. I did find the audio quality of the flat ear speaker to be somewhat tinny and difficult to hear in noisier areas, but not enough to be a dealbreaker. I use a headest which minimizes this issue. The audio and video player is second to none, both in terms of functionality and audio fidelity. Perhaps I could get over my fair first impression and use the iPhone for business after all &#8211; there is tremendous utility that benefits from the iPhone&#8217;s operating system.</p>
<div id="attachment_131" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-131" title="Spam Email" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/email2-200x300.jpg" alt="Spam Email" width="200" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">No spam filtering. Smut everywhere.</p></div>
<p>Email POP or IMAP setup on the iPhone is quick, simple to use and well crafted. It visually provides a very good user interface and experience. My joy was short lived when I began to realize that I couldn&#8217;t easily have emails automatically set to justify to the width of the screen. My Blackberry was able to format these emails automatically so that text was legible at the right size. My choice on the iPhone was to either view in landscape mode or make the size of the screen bigger and scroll from side to side and down to read, which is rather laborious. There was no way to filter spam and none of the 60,000+ applications in the iTunes store provided much relief. Sadly, I read a post by a spam prevention developer that<a title="Apple Doesn't All Developers to Create Spam Prevention Applications" href="http://mashable.com/2008/07/30/how-to-despam-iphone-email/"> Apple simply doesn&#8217;t provide tools for developers</a> to modify or extend the iPhone OS in certain areas. Common features such as &#8220;select all&#8221; to delete every item in a mailbox is not provided, nor the ability to dump email from all your accounts into one consolidated mailbox. It is not possible at present to download email attachments. Email is getting there but will take some time to add functionality that most of us who use email regularly have come to expect as standard on other devices.</p>
<p>If you run a business and manage any kind of photos, text files or other media files with regularity, the iPhone may provide a frustrating and disorganized experience. Apple believes that the phone should follow the principles of cloud computing and use wireless technologies to transfer all of your documents and files. Not surprisingly, some problems can be resolved using wireless services purchased from Apple such as &#8220;<a title="Apple Mobile Me" href="http://www.apple.com/mobileme/">mobileme</a>&#8221; which will add additional cost to your purchase. But more disturbing is that Apple didn&#8217;t leave any option to use the &#8220;old&#8221; method of simply using a cable to connect your device to a PC to drag and drop files or synchronize them.</p>
<p>Unlike any other PDA you&#8217;ve had for years, the iPhone has no &#8220;disk mode&#8221; &#8211; it isn&#8217;t made to act as a USB drive where you can plug it into your PC, drag and drop files onto the phone&#8217;s &#8220;hard drive&#8221; which makes the files available to all your phone&#8217;s applications. If you&#8217;re a doctor or lawyer who uses dictation, get used to having to manually turning on WiFi and connecting to a WiFi enabled computer just to transfer your files each day. But even with WiFi there is no drag and drop process. There is no file &#8220;explorer&#8221; type functionality to browse the phone&#8217;s vast 32GB storage area &#8211; each application can only see files which have been transferred to the phone using that application&#8217;s specific transfer utility. The uploaded files are stored in that application&#8217;s private folder, so you can expect documents and files to be scattered amongst different applications on your phone and not in one convenient place. If you only require document viewing, there are applications that allow you to use your iPhone as a USB drive and drag and drop files onto the mounted iPhone. But this method does not allow any of the files, for example a photo, to be accessible for editing in your favorite photo editor &#8211; remember that the application you want to use must be the application that transferred the file to your device via WiFi or other wireless method. I think this is awkward at best.</p>
<p>iTunes synchronization still does <em>not </em>handle &#8211; to my great surprise &#8211; <em>any</em> documents such as text, Word, Excel and PDF files. iTunes only handles &#8220;tunes&#8221; such as audio and video files.  I find this extremely frustrating and time consuming. As my iPhone stays in its USB dock most of the time, connecting it to WiFi is, to me, a needless hassle. If you have 3 different applications to read or manipulate files, you must connect via WiFi (by finding the phone&#8217;s IP address or pairing the device) and then using each individual application to transfer respective files and to sync them. If you&#8217;re on the road and don&#8217;t have access to WiFi or to the wireless network, you simply won&#8217;t be able to get a file into your iPhone to view or edit using your application of choice. And as per the above, even if a document is on the phone, you can&#8217;t move it from location to location &#8211; the only solution I could find is to use application A to download the device onto a hard disk and then use application B to upload that file back onto the iPhone. Again, this makes file management an incredible chore and unique only to the iPhone.</p>
<div id="attachment_130" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 234px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-130" title="Documents To Go" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/DocsToGo-224x300.jpg" alt="No, that's not file navigation." width="224" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">No, that&#39;s not file navigation.</p></div>
<p>Let&#8217;s try a real world example &#8211; Documents to Go, the standard for Microsoft Office viewing and editing on many mobile platforms. How do you get files onto the iPhone for viewing and editing in Docs to Go? If you receive a Word document via email, there is no capability to download the attachment onto your iPhone at all. Even sending to a Hotmail or web-based email account is no solution, since the iPhone browser (Safari) will not allow you to download the document. You cannot simply drag and drop your Word document onto the phone if it&#8217;s plugged into the USB port. And, remember, there is no document synchronization option using a wired connection either. So&#8230; how <em>do </em>you get that file into the iPhone? (i) You must have a WiFi connection. (ii) You must obtain a random number on the Docs to Go iPhone application to enter into the Docs to Go desktop software to &#8220;pair&#8221; the device (even more complicated with QuickOffice which requires you to obtain the phone&#8217;s IP address). (iii) You can now transfer files using the Docs to Go synchronization software. In contrast to how this has been done on other mobile platforms with &#8220;one button&#8221; or automatic synchronization of all yor files, you can see how much of a hassle this can be if you intend to use Docs to Go.</p>
<p>Outlook sync works quite well but don&#8217;t expect synchronizing your calendar to be easy if you&#8217;re a power user. I discovered rather quickly that the built in calendar system has limitations and doesn&#8217;t provide several common features such as default alarm time, e.g. setting your alarm to ring one hour before every appointment unless manually entered by the user. There are some PIM replacements but far from their counterparts appearing on other mobile operating systems. Many PIM applications follow Apple&#8217;s &#8220;cloud computing and always wireless&#8221; focus, choosing to sync with Google calendar rather than Outlook (such as the popular Pocket Informant.) Task management is not offered out of the box, none of the good choices are Outlook compatible and virtually none have desktop clients for the PC to view and enter your tasks. You&#8217;ll probably need to view calendar in one desktop/web-based application and tasks in another. Synchronizing your iPhone with two desktop computers requires going to users who have hacked files to &#8220;trick&#8221; iTunes into permitting this function. That&#8217;s not acceptable, especially since most business professionals will have at least a desktop home/office PC and a traveling netbook or laptop.</p>
<p>So what can you expect from the iPhones 60,000+ applications? Some of them are very good and extremely easy to use. This is a tremendous asset the iPhone has over many other platforms. The overwhelming majority of iPhone applications are games, useful tools for purposes other than managing the iPhone, and iPhone optimized versions of popular web sites &#8211; the iPhone <em>is </em>the new WAP. If you&#8217;re looking for efficiency navigating the most popular web sites, there is no subsitute for the iPhone.</p>
<div id="attachment_140" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 218px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-140" title="NYT" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/NYT-208x300.jpg" alt="iPhone apps are just the new WAP. Love the big ads too." width="208" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">iPhone apps are the new WAP. Superb ease and user experience. Get used to the advertisements!</p></div>
<p>Numerous iPhone applications provide a completely new experience that is different from other &#8220;freeware&#8221; on other mobile platforms. They are designed to collect an email address from the user (usually for service based applications) and/or to provide what appears as flash-based advertising on the iPhone. There is a great potential for marketing and revenue collection on the iPhone which is one incentive for iPhone developers.</p>
<p>On the dark side, there are a dearth of external applications that enhance the existing limitations of the phone OS and business tools that work well with a PC. If a feature isn&#8217;t present in the phone, it could be a while until you&#8217;ll see it appear. It took years just for Apple to provide &#8220;copy and paste&#8221; functionality on the iPhone and we wonder how long it will be until there is spam filtering, power saving utilities, true file management and attachment downloading, all which are critical for business and available on every other platform but the iPhone. As echoed before, most good solutions are available only on the Mac, such as tasks management.</p>
<p>Battery life &#8211; unfortunately with the iPhone 3GS, there is a significant probability that your iPhone may not last through a single day without charging the device somewhere. Apple <a title="Apple iPhone has reduced size battery" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-iphone3-2009jul03,0,2546606.story">reduced the size of the battery in the iPhone 3GS by 15%</a>,which is exacerbaged by the iPhone&#8217;s dependency on using energy challenging wireless connections and applications that always believe you are connected. My estimation is that 40 minutes of phone usage, 80 minutes of PDA usage, 30 minute email check and 40 minutes playing music will easily push your phone at or below the critical 35% mark, even with <a title="Apple iPhone 3GS Battery Saving Tips" href="http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html">Apple&#8217;s &#8220;solution&#8221; for its middling 3GS battery life</a> (recommending that purchasers reduce or remove all the features which compelled consumers to buy the iPhone.) An example of why the phone drains batteries so quickly is the software &#8211; if you do so much as open an email account to review your emails, the iPhone attempts to connect wireless. There is no way to turn this off. And like numerous other iPhone applications, even being in &#8220;airplane mode&#8221; with the radio off, applications will warn you incessantly that the radio is off and give you a convenient but annoying ability to open the control panel to turn it back on.</p>
<p>Unfortunately Apple also seals the iPhone so that there can be no user replaceable battery. If you&#8217;re questioning whether the battery life can be anemic, ask yourself why there are so many third party aftermarket solutions, which for the iPhone translates to purchasing an expensive power brick to carry with you on your journey. Battery saving utilities you&#8217;d find on Windows Mobile, Blackberry, Palm or Android devices are only available on the iPhone if you &#8220;<a title="How to Jailbreak the iphone" href="http://www.appleiphonereview.com/iphone-tutorials/iphone-jailbreak/">jailbreak</a>&#8221; the phone, meaning you have used a program to break Apple&#8217;s proprietary OS from preventing the use non-Apple approved applications (and which will void your warranty.) Even the &#8220;today&#8221; screen which is popular on virtually every handheld but the iPhone,<a title="Intelliscreen Only Available on Jailbreak iPhones" href="http://www.seangw.com/wordpress/index.php/2008/09/apples-controversy-regarding-stealing-ideas-from-intelliscreen/"> is only available from a third party developer</a> for phones that have been freed from Apple&#8217;s shackles.</p>
<div id="attachment_132" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-132" style="margin: 8px;" title="Thesaurus" src="http://www.thelawprofessor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Thesaurus-199x300.jpg" alt="Thesaurus" width="199" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Very useful application and the bottom advertisement is ubiquitous!</p></div>
<p>In the end, there are many positive aspects of the iPhone I didn&#8217;t cover including its fast processor, ease of use, excellent wireless implementation, etc. I merely covered the issues to let the buyer beware before purchasing the iPhone. For most who just want to view documents they have received in email (like the old Blackberry), the iPhone will work just fine. It has a superior user interface for many applications but it comes at the expense of being very limited in many instances with significant improvements potentially a long way off. If you like the ease of drag and drop &#8211; which I do &#8211; you&#8217;ll find getting document management a tedious, unrefined chore on the iPhone. This is double if you do a great deal of file transferring on the road and don&#8217;t have access to WiFi at work to connect to your PC.</p>
<p>Am I keeping my iPhone? The jury is out. On one hand, it&#8217;s a joy to have every day on my daily commute. It has so many applications that make surfing popular web sites a joy to use. On the other hand, the constant need to recharge the device and awkard document management that requires WiFi leaves me wondering whether I&#8217;ll still be happy when all those incredible mobile phones released in Europe and Asia finally hit the US. I&#8217;m not sure that the Palm Pre is ready for prime time but, if my sources are correct, if you can hold off for 3-6 months, you&#8217;ll start seeing new arrivals on the market like the powerful <a title="HTC Touch Pro2" href="http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_touch_pro2-2690.php">HTC Touch Pro2</a> that may be more satisfying for document usage and email management than the iPhone. The rumored &#8220;Storm 2&#8243; may also provide significant enhancements that might make the business tailored Blackberry the mobile device of choice for business. The iPhone is a great tool and whether it&#8217;s unique and proprietary system will work for you is your choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/apple-iphone-3gs-review-bad-for-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Taps Into Steroids, now Apple iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/congress-taps-into-steroids-now-apple-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/congress-taps-into-steroids-now-apple-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thelawprofessor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelawprofessor.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if it wasn't enough for Congress to be wasting its time and spending millions in taxpayer dollars to fight the war for professional sports leagues against steroids. Now four members of Congress have decided to call for an investigation into whether AT&#038;T should be able to have an exclusive agreement with Apple for distrubution of the iPhone and use on its network. I'm unaware that our Constitution provides for the right to have an iPhone on any carrier of one's choosing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if it wasn&#8217;t enough for Congress to be wasting its time and spending millions in taxpayer dollars to fight the war for professional sports leagues against steroids. Now four members of Congress have decided to call for an investigation into whether AT&amp;T should be able to have an exclusive agreement with Apple for distrubution of the iPhone and use on its network. I&#8217;m unaware that our Constitution provides for the right to have an iPhone on any carrier of one&#8217;s choosing.<span id="more-50"></span>Considering that our government recently found no anti-trust problem with Google&#8217;s purchase of DoubleClick (<a title="Google plus Doubleclick is over 80% of online ads" href="http://news.cnet.com/2100-1024_3-6176180.html">controlling the overwhelming majority of online ads</a>), it boggles the mind that Congress would be concerned with Apple&#8217;s exclusive contract with one mobile phone supplier &#8211; is this really any different than the Palm Pre, the Blackberry Bold and 96MB RAM version of the Blackberry Curve? Sure the terms are onerous &#8211; buy the phone at full retail value and get hit with a termination fee if you leave and an inability to use the phone on another network. But that is the consumer choice and right not to buy an iPhone. Additionally, if you buy a Verizon CDMA-based phone, you wouldn&#8217;t be able to use it on another network either. It&#8217;s not like this issue is exclusive to the iPhone.<a title="Tim Wu Comments" href="http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2007/07/iphone_congress.html"> Professor Tim Wu comments</a> on this issue &#8211; I&#8217;ve met him several times at some of his speaking engagements. He&#8217;s discussed the problems of switching carriers before and how a phone becomes an &#8220;expensive paperweight&#8221; in the US.</p>
<p>Committee chair Ed Markey (D-MA) complained that provider exclusivity and high fees are &#8220;stultifying innovation and unquestionably [diminishing] consumer choice.&#8221; I&#8217;m wondering how a GSM-based iPhone &#8220;stultifies&#8221; innovation and whether providing Major League Baseball and the National Football League with  anti-trust exemptions doesn&#8217;t limit consumer choice to watch different professional sports leagues. In the latter example, there is no alternative. In the former, if you don&#8217;t like the iPhone, get a Palm Pre, a Blackberry or any other phone you&#8217;d like. If the iPhone cannot be exclusively tied to AT&amp;T, then essentially this is a death knell to all freedom of contract for any manufacturer to obtain a premium to distribute exclusively with one or few outlets. Unless I&#8217;m missing something here, why is Congress wasting its time on this investigation. Possible reasons:</p>
<ol>
<li>A few members of Congress are hoping to win public sympathy by providing the iPhone to places where AT&amp;T coverage is not optimal</li>
<li>Several members of Congress don&#8217;t use AT&amp;T mobile phone service but badly want an iPhone</li>
<li> Big players are hoping to use Congress to break AT&amp;T&#8217;s exclusive deal with Apple for the iPhone</li>
</ol>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got opinions, I&#8217;d enjoy hearing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thelawprofessor.com/congress-taps-into-steroids-now-apple-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
